100% Free Real Updated ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Questions & Answers Pass Your Exam Easily
Easily To Pass New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Verified & Correct Answers
NEW QUESTION # 64
下列哪兩項敘述是正確的？
- A. 作為認證機構審核的一部分，審核員負責驗證組織的法律合規狀態
- B. 透過第三方審核，審核員評估組織如何確保 4 6 了解法律要求的變更
- C. 認證機構審核員的角色包括評估組織的流程，以確保遵守其法律要求
Answer: B,C
Explanation:
The following statements are true:
* The role of a certification body auditor involves evaluating the organization's processes for ensuring compliance with their legal requirements. This is part of the auditor's responsibility to assess the effectiveness and conformity of the organization's ISMS against the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard and the applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
* During a third-party audit, the auditor evaluates how the organization ensures that they are made aware of changes to the legal requirements. This is part of the auditor's responsibility to verify that the organization has established and maintained a process for identifying and updating their legal and other requirements related to information security. The following statement is false:
* As part of a certification body audit, the auditor is responsible for verifying the organization's legal compliance status. This is not true, as the auditor is not authorized or qualified to provide legal advice or judgment on the organization's compliance status. The auditor can only report on the evidence of compliance or noncompliance observed during the audit, but the ultimate responsibility for ensuring legal compliance lies with the organization. References: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 66. : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 67.
: ISO/IEC 27001 LEAD AUDITOR - PECB, page 22.
NEW QUESTION # 65
管理審核計畫的個人負責下列哪兩項行動？
- A. 確定適用於每次審核的法律要求
- B. 定義單獨審核的計劃
- C. 審核期間與受審核方溝通
- D. 柯平向認證機構通報了審核計畫的進度
- E. 確定審核計畫所需的資源
- F. 定義單獨審核的目標、範圍和標準
Answer: D,E
Explanation:
* Establishing the audit programme objectives, scope and criteria
* Determining the resources necessary for the audit programme, such as the audit team members, the budget, the time, the tools, etc.
* Selecting and appointing the audit team leaders and auditors
* Reviewing and approving the audit plans and arrangements
* Ensuring the effective communication and coordination among the audit programme stakeholders, such as the auditors, the auditees, the certification bodies, the accreditation bodies, etc.
* Keeping informed the accreditation body on the progress of the audit programme, especially in case of any significant changes, issues, or nonconformities
* Monitoring and reviewing the performance and results of the audit programme and the audit teams
* Evaluating the feedback and satisfaction of the auditees and other interested parties
* Identifying and implementing the opportunities for improvement of the audit programme The individual(s) managing the audit programme are not responsible for the following tasks, which are delegated to the audit team leaders or the auditors12:
* Communicating with the auditee during the audit, such as conducting the opening and closing meetings, resolving any audit-related problems, reporting any audit findings, etc.
* Determining the legal requirements applicable to each audit, such as the confidentiality, the impartiality, the consent, the liability, etc.
* Defining the objectives, scope and criteria for an individual audit, which are derived from the audit programme and agreed with the auditee
* Defining the plan of an individual audit, which includes the audit schedule, the audit activities, the audit methods, the audit documents, etc.
References:
* ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems
* PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, pages 19-20
NEW QUESTION # 66
本組織擁有第三方認證機構核發的 ISO/IEC 27001 資訊安全管理系統 (ISMS) 認證。下列哪一項代表了擁有認可認證的優點？
- A. 對認證過程可信度的認可。
- B. 審核報告的清晰度
- C. 組織產品的行銷價格上漲
- D. 客戶端數量增加
Answer: A
Explanation:
One of the advantages of having accredited certification of ISMS to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is that it demonstrates the recognition of the credibility of the certification process. Accredited certification means that the certification body has been assessed and approved by an accreditation body, which ensures that the certification body operates according to international standards and follows impartiality, competence and consistency principles. Accredited certification also enhances the confidence of the organisation's customers, partners, regulators and other interested parties in the organisation's information security performance and compliance. References: = ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 0.2; [PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor], page 6; Key Benefits of ISO 27001 Certification - IT Governance.
NEW QUESTION # 67
資料完整性意味著
- A. 資料只能由適當的人存取
- B. 資料應始終可見
- C. 資料的準確性和完整性
Answer: C
Explanation:
Integrity of data means accuracy and completeness of the data. Integrity is one of the three main objectives of information security, along with confidentiality and availability. Integrity ensures that information and systems are not corrupted, modified, or deleted by unauthorized actions or events. Data should be viewable at all times is not related to integrity, but to availability. Data should be accessed by only the right people is not related to integrity, but to confidentiality. References: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 24. : [ISO/IEC 27001 Brochures | PECB], page 4.
NEW QUESTION # 68
審核員需要與受審核方進行有效溝通。因此，他們的個人行為是確保審計成功所需的關鍵特徵。以下是其特徵和相關的簡要描述。將特徵與描述相符。
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
The possible matches of the characteristics to the descriptions are:
* Tenacious: Persistent and focused on objectives
* Ethical: Fair, truthful, sincere, honest, discreet
* Diplomatic: Tactful in dealing with individuals
* Observant: Actively observing surroundings/activities
* Perceptive: Aware of and able to understand situations
* Open to improvement: Willing to learn from situations
Actively observing surroundings/activities = Observant
Fair, truthful, sincere, honest, discreet = Ethical
Persistent and focused on objectives = Tenacious
Willing to learn from situations = Open to improvement
Tactful in dealing with individuals = Diplomatic
Aware of and able to understand situations = Perceptive
These are the auditor's characteristics and their descriptions as defined by ISO 19011:2022, Clause
7.2.21. The auditor's personal behaviour is essential for building trust and confidence with the auditee and for ensuring the credibility and effectiveness of the audit12. References: 1: ISO 19011:2022, Guidelines for auditing management systems, Clause 7.2.2 \n2: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Exam Preparation Guide, Domain 3: Fundamental audit concepts and principles
NEW QUESTION # 69
在與管理認證機構審核計畫的個人進行討論時，客戶組織的管理系統代表會要求指定特定審核員來進行認證審核。選擇以下選項中的兩個來了解管理審核計劃的個人應如何應對。
- A. 通知管理系統代表他的請求可以被接受
- B. 建議請求認證機構管理層允許該請求
- C. 告知管理系統代表，審核團隊的選擇是審核專案經理需要根據可用資源做出的決定
- D. 表明他的請求將被考慮，但可能不會被接受
- E. 建議管理系統代表選擇其他認證機構
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, a certification body should ensure that its auditors are competent, impartial, and independent from the auditee organization2. Therefore, if a Management System Representative of a client organization asks for a specific auditor for the certification audit, the individual(s) managing the audit programme should respond in a way that does not compromise these principles or create any conflict of interest or undue influence2. Two possible ways to respond are to state that his request will be considered but may not be taken up, as there may be other factors that affect the auditor selection process; or to advise him that the audit team selection is a decision that the audit programme manager needs to make based on the resources available, such as auditor availability, competence, location, etc2. The other options are not suitable ways to respond in this situation. For example, advising him that his request can be accepted may raise doubts about the objectivity and credibility of the auditor and the certification body; suggesting that he chooses another certification body may imply that his request is unreasonable or unethical; and suggesting asking the certification body management to permit his request may suggest that there is room for negotiation or manipulation in auditor selection2. References: ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements
NEW QUESTION # 70
您正在一家名為 ABC 的提供醫療保健服務的住宅療養院進行 ISMS 審核。您會發現所有療養院居民都戴著電子腕帶，用於監控他們的位置、心跳和血壓。您了解到，電子腕帶會自動將所有資料上傳到人工智慧（AI）雲端伺服器，供醫護人員進行健康監測和分析。
為了驗證 ISMS 的範圍，您採訪了管理系統代表 (MSR)，他解釋說 ISMS 範圍涵蓋外包資料中心。
選擇三個選項作為您需要尋找的審核證據，以驗證 ISMS 的範圍。
- A. 被審核方已確定居民對健康醫療服務的需求和期望
- B. 被審核方已確定居民對設施和環境安全的需求和期望
- C. 被審核方已確定政府當局對醫療保健服務和病患資料處理的需求和期望
- D. 受審核方已確定居民對於如何保護居民個人資料的需求和期望
- E. 被審核方擁有 ISO 9001 認證
- F. 與人工智慧雲端伺服器所在資料中心的IT服務協議
- G. 被審核方已確定居民對舒適設施、醫療專業人員能力和清潔環境的需求和期望
- H. 被審核方正在考慮從外部軟體公司購買醫療保健監控應用程式
Answer: C,D,F
Explanation:
According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 4.3, the organisation shall determine the scope of the information security management system (ISMS) by considering the internal and external issues, the requirements of interested parties, and the interfaces and dependencies with other organisations12 In this case, the ISMS scope covers an outsourced data center that hosts the artificial intelligence (AI) cloud server for healthcare monitoring and analysis of the residents' data. Therefore, the audit evidence you need to find to verify the scope of the ISMS should include:
* The auditee has identified the governmental authorities' needs and expectations on healthcare services and patient data handling. This is an external issue and an interested party requirement that affects the ISMS scope, as the auditee has to comply with the relevant laws and regulations regarding the quality, safety, and privacy of healthcare services and patient data12
* The auditee has identified the resident's needs and expectations on how they should protect the resident' s personal data. This is an external issue and an interested party requirement that affects the ISMS scope, as the auditee has to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the resident's personal data that is collected, processed, and stored by the electronic wristband and the AI cloud server12
* The IT service agreement with the data center where the artificial intelligence (AI) cloud server is located. This is an interface and dependency with another organisation that affects the ISMS scope, as the auditee has to control the externally provided processes, products, and services that are relevant to the ISMS, and to implement appropriate contractual requirements related to information security12 The following options are not relevant or sufficient for verifying the scope of the ISMS:
* The auditee has identified the resident's needs and expectations on the facility and environmental safety. This is an external issue and an interested party requirement, but it does not affect the ISMS scope, as it is not related to information security12
* The auditee has ISO 9001 certification. This is an indication of the auditee's quality management system, but it does not verify the scope of the ISMS, as it is not related to information security12
* The auditee has identified the resident's needs and expectations on the comfort facility, medical professional's competence, and clean environment. These are external issues and interested party requirements, but they do not affect the ISMS scope, as they are not related to information security12
* The auditee has identified the resident's needs and expectations on healthcare medical treatment services. These are external issues and interested party requirements, but they do not verify the scope of the ISMS, as they are not specific to information security12
* The auditee is considering the purchase of a healthcare monitoring app from an external software company. This is a potential change that may affect the ISMS scope in the future, but it does not verify the current scope of the ISMS, as it is not yet implemented or controlled12 References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2
NEW QUESTION # 71
認證機構在決定授予認證時不需要審核報告中的下列哪一項結論？
- A. 解決與輕微不合格項相關的糾正措施的計劃已被接受
- B. 組織針對重大不合格項採取的糾正措施已被接受。
- C. 已符合認證範圍
- D. 組織完全遵守適用於資訊安全管理系統的所有法律和其他要求。
Answer: D
Explanation:
The conclusion in the audit report that is not required by the certification body when deciding to grant certification is that the organisation fully complies with all legal and other requirements applicable to the ISMS. This is because the certification body does not have the authority or the responsibility to verify the legal compliance of the organisation, as this is outside the scope of ISO/IEC 27001:2022. The certification body only evaluates the conformity of the organisation's ISMS with the requirements of the standard, which include the establishment of a process to identify and evaluate the legal and other requirements that are relevant to the ISMS. The organisation is responsible for ensuring its own legal compliance and for providing evidence of such compliance to the certification body if requested. References: = ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause
6.1.3; ISO/IEC 27006:2022, clause 9.2.2.4; PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 29.
NEW QUESTION # 72
您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核團隊負責人，正在與分配給您的審核團隊的正在接受培訓的審核員進行交談。您希望確保他們了解計劃-實施-檢查-行動週期的檢查階段對於資訊安全管理系統的運作的重要性。
您可以透過要求他選擇最能完成句子的單字來做到這一點：
要使用最佳單字完成句子，請按一下要完成的空白部分，使其以紅色突出顯示，然後從下面的選項中按一下適用的文字。或者，您可以將該選項拖曳到適當的空白部分。
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
* Review is the third stage of the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, which is a four-step model for implementing and improving an information security management system (ISMS) according to ISO
/IEC 27001:202212. Review involves assessing and measuring the performance of the ISMS against the established policies, objectives, and criteria12.
* Assess is the verb that describes the action of reviewing the ISMS. Assess means to evaluate, analyze, or measure something in a systematic and objective manner3. Assessing the ISMS involves collecting and verifying audit evidence, identifying strengths and weaknesses, and determining the degree of conformity or nonconformity12.
* Regular is the adjective that describes the frequency or interval of reviewing the ISMS. Regular means occurring or done at fixed or uniform intervals4. Reviewing the ISMS at regular intervals means conducting internal audits and management reviews periodically, such as annually, quarterly, or monthly, depending on the needs and risks of the organization12.
* Suitability is one of the attributes that describes the quality or outcome of reviewing the ISMS. Suitability means being appropriate or fitting for a particular purpose, person, or situation5. Reviewing the ISMS for suitability means ensuring that it is aligned with the organization's strategic direction, business objectives, and information security requirements12.
References :=
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements
* ISO/IEC 27003:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Guidance
* Assess | Definition of Assess by Merriam-Webster
* Regular | Definition of Regular by Merriam-Webster
* Suitability | Definition of Suitability by Merriam-Webster
NEW QUESTION # 73
審核員在確定 (2)-------- 時應考慮 (1)--------
- A. (1) 稽核風險，(2) 稽核目標
- B. （1）標準要求。 （二）審核標準
- C. (1) 與違法行為相關的處罰，(2) 重要性
Answer: A
Explanation:
The auditor should consider "audit risks" when determining the "audit objectives." Understanding the risks associated with the audit helps define the objectives clearly, ensuring that the audit focuses on the most significant areas of concern, aligns with the audit scope, and adequately addresses the risks identified.
References: ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems
NEW QUESTION # 74
情境 8：EsBank 自 9 月起為愛沙尼亞銀行業提供銀行和金融解決方案
2010年，該公司在全國擁有30家分行和100多台ATM機。
EsBank 在高度監管的行業中運營，必須遵守許多有關資料安全和隱私的法律和法規。他們需要透過實施技術和非技術控制來管理整個營運的資訊安全。 EsBank 決定實施基於 ISO/IEC 的 ISMS
27001，因為它提供了更好的安全性、更多的風險控制以及符合法律法規的關鍵要求。
在成功實施 ISMS 九個月後，EsBank 決定由獨立認證機構根據 ISO/IEC 27001 對其 ISMS 進行認證。
第一階段和第二階段審核是共同進行的，發現了一些不符合項。第一個不合格之處與 EsBank 的資訊標籤有關。該公司有資訊分類方案，但沒有資訊標籤程序。因此，需要相同保護等級的文件將被貼上不同的標籤（有時為機密，有時為敏感）。
考慮到所有文件也以電子方式存儲，不合格情況也影響了媒體處理。審計小組透過抽樣得出結論，200 個可移動媒體中有 50 個儲存了被錯誤分類為機密的敏感資訊。根據資訊分類方案，允許將機密資訊儲存在可移動媒體中，而嚴格禁止儲存敏感資訊。這標誌著另一個不合格之處。
他們起草了不合格報告，並與 EsBank 代表討論了審計結論，代表同意在兩個月內針對發現的不合格問題提交行動計劃。
EsBank 接受了審計組組長提出的解決方案。他們根據實體和電子格式的分類方案起草了資訊標籤程序，解決了不合格問題。可移動媒體程式也基於此程式進行了更新。
審計完成兩週後，EsBank 提交了總體行動計畫。在那裡，他們解決了檢測到的不合格問題以及採取的糾正措施，但沒有包括有關受影響的系統、控製或操作的任何詳細資訊。審核小組評估了該行動計劃並得出結論，該計劃將解決不合格問題。然而，EsBank 收到了不利的認證建議。
根據上述場景，回答以下問題：
場景 8 所示的哪一種行為在外部審計中是不可接受的？
- A. 第一階段審核與第二階段審核同時進行
- B. 缺乏資訊標籤程序標示為輕微不合格
- C. 審核組長提出了解決不符合項的具體解決方案
Answer: C
Explanation:
The audit team leader suggesting a specific solution on resolving the nonconformities is unacceptable in an external audit. This could compromise the impartiality of the audit process by appearing to assist the auditee in corrective actions, which should independently originate from the auditee to ensure the integrity and effectiveness of the ISMS.
NEW QUESTION # 75
下列哪一項最能描述第一階段第三方審核的主要目的？
- A. 了解組織的採購狀況
- B. 了解組織的客戶
- C. 確定第 2 階段審核的紅色程度
- D. 準備獨立審計報告
- E. 檢查組織是否遵守法律
- F. 向客戶介紹審核團隊
Answer: C
Explanation:
The main purpose of a Stage 1 third-party audit is to determine readiness for a Stage 2 audit. A Stage 1 audit is a preliminary assessment that evaluates the organization's ISMS documentation, scope, context, and objectives, and identifies any major gaps or nonconformities that need to be addressed before the Stage 2 audit. A Stage 1 audit does not introduce the audit team to the client, as this is done during the audit planning phase. A Stage 1 audit does not check for legal compliance by the organization, as this is done during the Stage 2 audit. A Stage 1 audit does not prepare an independent audit report, as this is done after the Stage 2 audit. References: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 70. : ISO/IEC
27001 LEAD AUDITOR - PECB, page 23.
NEW QUESTION # 76
您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核團隊負責人，正在與分配給您的審核團隊的正在接受培訓的審核員進行交談。您希望確保他們了解計劃-執行-檢查-行動週期的檢查階段對於資訊安全管理系統的運作的重要性。
您可以透過要求他選擇最能描述檢查活動目的的答案來做到這一點
'管理審查。
管理評審的目的是： 選擇 1
- A. 定期評估資訊安全管理體系，以確保其持續有效率、充分且有效。
- B. 定期考慮資訊安全管理體系，以確保其持續合規性、充分性和有效性。
- C. 依計畫的時間間隔檢視資訊安全管理體系，以確保其持續適用性、充分性和有效性。
- D. 定期更新資訊安全管理體系，以確保其持續符合性、充分性和有效性。
Answer: C
Explanation:
The management review is a key component of the "Check" stage in the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle.
Its primary purpose is to evaluate the overall ISMS and make strategic decisions for improvement. Here's why the other options are less accurate:
*A. Random intervals: Reviews should be conducted at planned intervals for consistency and tracking progress.
*B. Compliance: While compliance is a consideration, the main focus is on the system's suitability for the organization's needs, its adequacy in managing risks, and its overall effectiveness in achieving information security objectives.
*D. Update: The management review might lead to updates, but its primary goal is evaluation, not immediate modification.
References:
*ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Section 9.3 (Management Review): Outlines the purpose and requirement for conducting management reviews.
*PECB Candidate Handbook, ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor: Emphasizes the management review's role in evaluating the ISMS's suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness, driving continuous improvement.
NEW QUESTION # 77
您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核團隊負責人，負責對網路服務供應商進行第三方監督審核。您正在檢視組織的風險評估流程是否符合 ISO
/IEC 27001:2022。
以下哪三項審核結果會促使您提出不合格報告？
- A. 組織的資訊安全風險評估流程建議為每個風險分配一個風險負責人
- B. 組織正在按照識別的順序處理資訊安全風險
- C. 組織的風險評估標準尚未經過最高管理層的審查和批准
- D. 有不同的系統用於評估營運資訊安全風險和評估策略資訊安全風險
- E. 兩個系統都包含與保護資訊的機密性、完整性和可存取性無關的額外資訊安全風險
- F. 組織已將其所有資訊安全風險的機率評估為 0%、25%、
50%、75% 或 100% - G. 組織尚未使用 RAG（紅色、琥珀色、綠色）對其資訊安全風險進行分類。
相反，它使用了微笑表情符號、中性表情符號和悲傷表情符號 - H. 組織的資訊安全風險評估流程僅基於對每個風險影響的評估
Answer: B,C,H
Explanation:
The three audit findings that would prompt you to raise a nonconformity report are:
*The organisation is treating information security risks in the order in which they are identified
*The organisation's risk assessment criteria have not been reviewed and approved by top management
*The organisation's information security risk assessment process is based solely on an assessment of the impact of each risk According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.2, the organisation must establish and maintain an information security risk management process that is consistent with the organisation's context and aligned with its overall risk management approach1. This process must include the following steps:
*Establishing the risk assessment criteria, which must be approved by top management and reflect the organisation's risk appetite and objectives2
*Identifying the information security risks, which must consider the assets, threats, vulnerabilities, impacts, and likelihoods3
*Analysing the information security risks, which must determine the levels of risk and compare them with the risk criteria4
*Evaluating the information security risks, which must prioritise the risks and decide whether they need treatment or not5 Therefore, the audit findings B, E, and F indicate that the organisation is not following the required steps of the information security risk management process, and thus are nonconformities with the standard.
The other audit findings are not necessarily nonconformities, as they may be acceptable depending on the organisation's context and justification. For example:
*Audit finding A may be acceptable if the organisation has identified and treated the additional information security risks that are relevant to its scope and objectives, and has documented the rationale for doing so6
*Audit finding C may be acceptable if the organisation has assigned clear roles and responsibilities for the information security risk management process, and has ensured that the risk owners have the authority and competence to manage the risks7
*Audit finding D may be acceptable if the organisation has defined and communicated the meaning and implications of the emoji-based risk classification, and has ensured that it is consistent with the risk criteria and the risk treatment process8
*Audit finding G may be acceptable if the organisation has justified the use of discrete values for the probability of the information security risks, and has ensured that they are realistic and consistent with the risk criteria and the risk analysis method9
*Audit finding H may be acceptable if the organisation has established and maintained different systems for assessing operational and strategic information security risks, and has ensured that they are integrated and aligned with the overall risk management approach and the ISMS objectives10 References: 1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2; 2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2 a); 3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2 b); 4: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2 c); 5: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2 d); 6: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.0.2; 7: ISO
/IEC 27001:2022, 5.3; 8: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2 a) 2); 9: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2 c) 2); 10: ISO/IEC
27001:2022, 6.1.2 a) 1); : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC
27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; :
ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022
NEW QUESTION # 78
您正在一家受 ABC 監管、提供醫療保健服務的住宅療養院進行 ISMS 審核。
審核計畫的下一步是驗證持續改善流程的有效性。在審計過程中，您了解到大多數居民家庭成員（90%）每週都會透過ABC的醫療保健行動應用程式透過電子郵件和簡訊收到一次WeCare醫療器材促銷廣告。他們均不同意將所收集的個人資料用於與ABC 簽署的服務協議上（或行銷或除護理和醫療之外的任何其他目的）。的資訊」個人資訊給不相關的第三方，他們已提出投訴。
服務經理表示，所有這些投訴均已被視為不合格，並且已根據不合格和糾正管理程序規劃和實施糾正措施。糾正措施包括立即停止與醫療設備製造商 WeCare 的合作，要求他們刪除收到的所有個人數據，並向所有居民及其家人發送道歉電子郵件。
您正在準備審計結果。選擇一項正確的發現選項。
- A. 無不合格情況：服務經理實施了糾正措施，客戶服務代表評估所實施的糾正措施的有效性
- B. 無不符合：我想收集更多有關組織如何定義管理系統範圍的證據，並了解它們是否涵蓋 WeCare 醫療器材製造
- C. 不符合：ABC未遵守與居民家庭成員簽署的醫療服務協議
- D. 不合格：管理評審未考慮居民家庭成員的回饋
Answer: C
Explanation:
According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 8.1.4, the organisation shall ensure that externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system are controlled. This includes implementing appropriate contractual requirements related to information security with external providers, such as customers who send ICT equipment for reclamation12 In this case, ABC is a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services to its residents and collects their personal data and their family members' personal data. ABC has a signed service agreement with the residents' family members that states that the collected personal data will not be used for marketing or any other purposes than nursing and medical care. However, ABC has violated this contractual requirement by sharing the personal data with WeCare, a medical device manufacturer, who has used the data to send promotional advertisements to the residents' family members via email and SMS. This has caused dissatisfaction and complaints from the residents' family members, who have a strong reason to believe that ABC is leaking their personal information to a non-relevant third party.
Therefore, the audit finding is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022, as ABC has failed to control the externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system, and has breached the contractual requirements related to information security with its customers. The fact that ABC has taken corrective actions to stop working with WeCare and to apologise to the customers does not eliminate the nonconformity, but only mitigates its consequences. The nonconformity still needs to be recorded, evaluated, and reviewed for effectiveness and improvement.
References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2
NEW QUESTION # 79
情境 4：SendPay 是一家金融公司，透過代理商和金融機構網路提供服務。他們的主要服務之一是在全球範圍內轉帳。 SendPay 作為一家新公司，致力於為客戶提供最優質的服務。由於該公司提供國際交易，因此要求客戶提供個人信息，例如身份、交易原因以及完成交易可能需要的其他詳細信息。因此，SendPay 已實施安全措施來保護客戶的訊息，包括偵測、調查和回應可能出現的任何資訊安全威脅。他們對提供安全服務的承諾也體現在 ISMS 實施過程中，該公司投入了大量時間和資源。
去年，SendPay 推出了他們的數位平台，允許透過智慧型手機或筆記型電腦等電子設備進行貨幣交易，而無需支付額外費用。透過這個平台，SendPay 的客戶可以隨時隨地發送和接收資金。該數位平台幫助SendPay簡化了公司營運並進一步拓展了業務。當時SendPay正在外包其軟體業務，因此該專案是由外包公司的軟體開發團隊完成的。
該團隊還負責維護 SendPay 的技術基礎設施。
最近，該公司在實施 ISMS 近一年後申請了 ISO/IEC 27001 認證。他們與符合其標準的認證機構簽訂了合約。不久之後，認證機構任命了一個由四名審核員組成的團隊來審核 SendPay 的 ISMS。
審計過程中，發現以下情況：
1.外包軟體公司在未事先通知的情況下終止了與SendPay的合約。結果，SendPay 無法立即將服務恢復到內部，其營運中斷了五天。審計人員要求 SendPay 的代表提供證據，證明他們在合約終止的情況下有計劃遵循。這些代表沒有提供任何書面證據，但在接受審計時，他們告訴審計人員，SendPay的高層已經確定了另外兩家軟體開發公司，如果類似情況再次發生，可以立即提供服務。
2. 沒有證據顯示對外包給軟體開發公司的活動進行了監控。 SendPay 的代表再次告訴審計人員，他們定期與軟體開發公司溝通，並適當地告知可能發生的任何變更。
3.防火牆測試未發現異常狀況。審核員測試了防火牆配置，以確定這些服務提供的安全等級。他們使用資料包分析器來測試防火牆策略，這使他們能夠即時檢查發送或接收的資料包。
根據該場景，回答以下問題：
為什麼SendPay在合約終止後無法恢復內部服務？請參閱場景 4。
- A. 因為 SendPay 缺乏全面的業務連續性計劃，存在合約終止的潛在影響
- B. 因為外包軟體公司在沒有事先通知的情況下終止了與SendPay的合約
- C. 因為SendPay沒有監控外包軟體營運的技術基礎設施
Answer: A
Explanation:
SendPay's inability to restore their services immediately after the contract termination indicates a lack of a comprehensive business continuity plan that addresses the potential impacts of such terminations. This oversight can result in significant operational disruptions, as observed.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Standard, Clause A.17 (Information security aspects of business continuity management)
NEW QUESTION # 80
您是一位經驗豐富的審核團隊負責人，負責為其客戶設計網站的組織進行第三方監督審核。您目前正在審查該組織的適用性聲明。
根據 ISO/IEC 27001 的要求，以下關於適用性聲明的觀察哪兩項是正確的？
- A. 僅需要對組織選擇排除的任何控制進行說明
- B. 適用性聲明必須在管理審查中進行審查
- C. 尋求 ISO/IEC 27001 合規性的組織必須出具適用性聲明
- D. 適用性聲明必須至少每年檢討一次
- E. 需要說明在適用性聲明中包含和排除附件 A 控制措施的理由
- F. 適用性聲明由組織的最高管理階層擁有和修改
Answer: C,E
NEW QUESTION # 81
下列哪一項不屬於資訊安全攻擊類型？
- A. 車輛事故
- B. 技術漏洞
- C. 隱私權事件
- D. 法律事件
Answer: A
Explanation:
Vehicular incidents are not a type of information security attack. A vehicular incident is an event that involves a vehicle or its driver causing damage or injury to people or property. A vehicular incident may have an impact on information security if it affects the availability or integrity of information or systems that are transported or accessed by vehicles, but it is not an intentional or malicious attack on information security.
Legal incidents are a type of information security attack that involve legal actions or disputes that may compromise the confidentiality or integrity of information or systems. Technical vulnerabilities are a type of information security attack that exploit weaknesses or flaws in software or hardware that may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information or systems. Privacy incidents are a type of information security attack that involve unauthorized access or disclosure of personal or sensitive information that may compromise the confidentiality or integrity of information or systems. References: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:
2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 25. : [ISO/IEC 27001 LEAD AUDITOR - PECB], page 13.
NEW QUESTION # 82
情境 8：EsBank 自 9 月起為愛沙尼亞銀行業提供銀行和金融解決方案
2010年，該公司在全國擁有30家分行和100多台ATM機。
EsBank 在高度監管的行業中運營，必須遵守許多有關資料安全和隱私的法律和法規。他們需要透過實施技術和非技術控制來管理整個營運的資訊安全。 EsBank 決定實施基於 ISO/IEC 的 ISMS
27001，因為它提供了更好的安全性、更多的風險控制以及符合法律法規的關鍵要求。
在成功實施 ISMS 九個月後，EsBank 決定由獨立認證機構根據 ISO/IEC 27001 對其 ISMS 進行認證。
第一階段和第二階段審核是共同進行的，發現了一些不符合項。第一個不合格之處與 EsBank 的資訊標籤有關。該公司有資訊分類方案，但沒有資訊標籤程序。因此，需要相同保護等級的文件將被貼上不同的標籤（有時為機密，有時為敏感）。
考慮到所有文件也以電子方式存儲，不合格情況也影響了媒體處理。審計小組透過抽樣得出結論，200 個可移動媒體中有 50 個儲存了被錯誤分類為機密的敏感資訊。根據資訊分類方案，允許將機密資訊儲存在可移動媒體中，而嚴格禁止儲存敏感資訊。這標誌著另一個不合格之處。
他們起草了不合格報告，並與 EsBank 代表討論了審計結論，代表同意在兩個月內針對發現的不合格問題提交行動計劃。
EsBank 接受了審計組組長提出的解決方案。他們根據實體和電子格式的分類方案起草了資訊標籤程序，解決了不合格問題。可移動媒體程式也基於此程式進行了更新。
審計完成兩週後，EsBank 提交了總體行動計畫。在那裡，他們解決了檢測到的不合格問題以及採取的糾正措施，但沒有包括有關受影響的系統、控製或操作的任何詳細資訊。審核小組評估了該行動計劃並得出結論，該計劃將解決不合格問題。然而，EsBank 收到了不利的認證建議。
根據上述場景，回答以下問題：
根據情境8，EsBank 提交了總體行動計畫。這是可以接受的嗎？
- A. 是的，具有相同根本原因的不符合項應該有一個總體行動計劃
- B. 不，行動計畫應該只解決一個不合格問題
- C. 不，一般行動計畫無法修正不合格項
Answer: C
Explanation:
No, a general action plan is not acceptable in this context because it lacks specific details on systems, controls, or operations impacted by the nonconformities. An effective action plan should detail the specific corrective actions for each nonconformity to ensure comprehensive resolution and prevent recurrence.
NEW QUESTION # 83
選擇最能描述如何進行資訊安全管理系統審核的選項：
- A. 應使用審核方法來評估客觀證據，以得出審核結果。然後，應制定審核結論並在末次會議上提交給受審核方。
- B. 審計目標應用於評估客觀證據，以得出審計結論。
然後，應建立審計建議並在管理審查時提交給最高管理層。 - C. 應使用審核方法來評估審核證據，以產生審核建議。
然後，應建立審核建議並在末次會議上提交給受審核方。 - D. 審計目標應用於評估審計證據，以得出審計結論。然後，應建立審核結果並在末次會議上提交給審核客戶。
- E. 應使用審核標準來評估間接證據，以產生審核結果。
然後，應建立審核報告並在審核組會議上提交給審核組。 - F. 應使用審核標準來評估客觀證據，以產生審核結果。然後，應建立審核報告並在末次會議上提交給審核組組長。
Answer: A
Explanation:
The option that best describes how Information Security Management System (ISMS) audits should be conducted, aligning with best practices and standards like ISO/IEC 27001:2022, is:
D: Audit methods should be used to assess objective evidence in order to generate audit findings. Then, the audit conclusion should be created and presented to the auditee at the closing meeting.
This option accurately reflects the audit process, emphasizing the use of systematic audit methods to assess objective evidence, which is crucial for impartiality and accuracy in auditing. Audit findings are the results derived from evaluating the objective evidence against the audit criteria. The conclusion, based on the audit findings, provides a comprehensive summary of the audit's outcomes, indicating whether the audited ISMS meets the established criteria. Presenting these conclusions to the auditee during the closing meeting ensures transparency and provides an opportunity for immediate clarification and discussion of the results and potential next steps.
NEW QUESTION # 84
您正在一家名為 ABC 的提供醫療保健服務的住宅療養院進行 ISMS 審核。
審核計劃的下一步是驗證 ABC 醫療保健行動應用程式開發、支援和生命週期流程的資訊安全性。在審核過程中，您了解到該組織將行動應用程式開發外包給了一家具有 CMMI 5 級、ITSM（ISO
/IEC
20000-1)、BCMS (ISO 22301) 和 ISMS (ISO/IEC 27001) 認證。 IT經理介紹了軟體安全管理流程，並將流程總結如下：
行動應用程式開發至少應採用「設計安全」和「預設安全」原則。應具備以下個人資料保護安全功能：
存取控制。
個人資料加密，即高階加密標準（AES）演算法，金鑰長度：256位元；個人資料假名化。
已檢查漏洞，無安全後門
您可以獲得最新的行動應用測試報告樣本 - 詳細資訊如下：
您詢問 IT 經理，為什麼組織仍在使用行動應用程序，而個人資料加密和假名化測試卻失敗了。此外，服務經理是否有權批准測試。
IT經理解釋說，根據軟體安全管理程序，測試結果應由他批准。加密和假名功能失敗的原因是這些功能嚴重降低了系統和服務效能。額外的
需要 150% 的資源來實現這一點。服務經理同意存取控制足夠好並且可以接受。這就是服務經理簽署批准書的原因。
您對醫務人員的手機進行採樣，發現 ABC 的醫療保健行動應用程式版本
1.01 已安裝。你發現1.01版本沒有測試記錄。
IT經理解釋說，由於勒索軟體攻擊頻繁，外包行動應用開發公司對受測軟體進行了免費小幅更新，並對更新後的軟體進行了緊急發布，並口頭保證不會對安全造成任何影響。以他20年的資訊安全經驗來看，沒有必要重新測試。
您正在準備審核結果 請選擇兩個正確的選項。
- A. 不存在不合格項 (NC)。 IT 經理展現了良好的領導能力。 （與條款相關
5.1，控制5.4） - B. 還有改進的機會 (OI)。 IT 經理應根據適當的測試做出是否繼續提供服務的決定。 （與第 8.1 條相關，控制措施 A.8.30）
- C. 存在不合格項 (NC)。 IT。管理者不遵守軟體安全管理程序。 （與第 8.1 條相關，控制措施 A.8.30）
- D. 存在不合格項 (NC)。組織不控制計劃的變更並審查非預期變更的後果。 （與第8.1條相關）
- E. 不存在不合格項 (NC)。 IT 經理證明他完全有能力。 （與第7.2條相關）
- F. 還有改進的機會 (OI)。該組織根據其提供的免費服務的範圍選擇外部服務提供者。 （與第 8.1 條相關，控制措施 A.5.21）
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001, organizations must control planned changes and review the consequences of unintended changes in order to ensure continued alignment with information security requirements. In this scenario, the organization failed to perform appropriate testing after an emergency update to the mobile app, which constitutes a nonconformity with clause 8.1 of the standard.
**References**:
- ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Reference Materials
- PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO 27001 Lead Auditor
ISO/IEC 27001 requires that organizations adhere to their established procedures for software security management. The IT Manager's approval of the app despite failed security tests and lack of proper documentation for the new version indicates noncompliance with the procedure, thus reflecting a nonconformity.
**References**:
- ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Reference Materials
- PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO 27001 Lead Auditor
NEW QUESTION # 85
......
Free ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam Files Downloaded Instantly: https://braindumps.exam4docs.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN-study-questions.html
